Faulty outline on method organization

Issue Report Checklist

• Searched the issues page for similar reports
• Read the relevant sections of the Spyder Troubleshooting Guide and followed its advice
• Reproduced the issue after updating with conda update spyder (or pip, if not using Anaconda)
• Could not reproduce inside jupyter qtconsole (if console-related)
• Tried basic troubleshooting (if a bug/error)
  • Restarted Spyder
  • Reset preferences with spyder --reset
  • Reinstalled the latest version of Anaconda
  • Tried the other applicable steps from the Troubleshooting Guide
• Completed the Problem Description, Steps to Reproduce and Version sections below

Problem Description

Say you have a class with many methods, and the methods can be ‘grouped’ by adding ### Marker at the beginning of a line between 2 ‘sections’ of methods, then the outline is picking up on this, however the indentation (and the distinguishing between method and function) is not correct.

What steps reproduce the problem?

copy the following code fragment in a file, and look at what ‘Outline’ is making of it

# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-

class demo(object):
    
    def __init__(self):
        pass
    
    def foo(self):
        pass
    
### bars 1
    def bar10(self):
        pass
    
    def bar11(self):
        pass
    
    def bar12(self):
        pass

### bars 2
    def bar20(self):
        pass
    
    def bar21(self):
        pass
    
    def bar22(self):
        pass

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

# bars 1 and # bars2 should reside one level deeper, under their demo class, and recognized as methods instead of functions now.

Paste Traceback/Error Below (if applicable)

PASTE TRACEBACK HERE

Versions

• Spyder version: 4.1.1
• Python version: Python 3.7.5 (default, Oct 31 2019, 15:18:51) [MSC v.1916 64 bit (AMD64)]
• IPython version: IPython 7.13.0 (but probably not related)
• Qt version: 5.9.6
• PyQt version: PYQT_CONFIGURATION = {‘sip_flags’: ‘-t WS_WIN -t Qt_5_9_6’}
• Operating System name/version: WIN10 (probably the same on OSX and Linux, but not tested by me yet)

Dependencies

# Mandatory:
atomicwrites >=1.2.0           :  1.3.0 (OK)
chardet >=2.0.0                :  3.0.4 (OK)
cloudpickle >=0.5.0            :  1.3.0 (OK)
diff_match_patch >=20181111    :  20181111 (OK)
intervaltree                   :  None (OK)
IPython >=4.0                  :  7.13.0 (OK)
jedi =0.15.2                   :  0.15.2 (OK)
nbconvert >=4.0                :  5.6.1 (OK)
numpydoc >=0.6.0               :  0.9.2 (OK)
paramiko >=2.4.0               :  2.7.1 (OK)
parso =0.5.2                   :  0.5.2 (OK)
pexpect >=4.4.0                :  4.8.0 (OK)
pickleshare >=0.4              :  0.7.5 (OK)
psutil >=5.3                   :  5.7.0 (OK)
pygments >=2.0                 :  2.6.1 (OK)
pylint >=0.25                  :  2.4.4 (OK)
pyls >=0.31.9;<0.32.0          :  0.31.9 (OK)
qdarkstyle >=2.8               :  2.8 (OK)
qtawesome >=0.5.7              :  0.7.0 (OK)
qtconsole >=4.6.0              :  4.7.1 (OK)
qtpy >=1.5.0                   :  1.9.0 (OK)
rtree >=0.8.3                  :  0.9.3 (OK)
sphinx >=0.6.6                 :  2.4.0 (OK)
spyder_kernels >=1.9.0;<1.10.0 :  1.9.0 (OK)
watchdog                       :  None (OK)
zmq >=17                       :  18.1.1 (OK)

# Optional:
cython >=0.21                  :  0.29.15 (OK)
matplotlib >=2.0.0             :  3.1.3 (OK)
numpy >=1.7                    :  1.18.1 (OK)
pandas >=0.13.1                :  1.0.2 (OK)
scipy >=0.17.0                 :  1.4.1 (OK)
sympy >=0.7.3                  :  1.5.1 (OK)

[bcolsen]

I’ll have a look at the code.

[bcolsen]

@KardoPaska If you want to see how the fix is going. I could use some help in testing my https://github.com/spyder-ide/spyder/pull/12343