Packaging for Multiple Targets
See original GitHub issueHowdy! Would you be open to a pull request that changes your build tooling to output distributable packages for multiple targets?
As is, it’s problematic to include this module in a project targeted for the browser due to use of ES6+ features (arrow functions, spread,…). I think it’s not uncommon for build tooling targeting the browser to exclude ./node_modules/
from transpilation (Babel). Of course… the user could always adjust their build, but… Also, the module built here doesn’t support tree shaking to reduce bundle size.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:8 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Multiple Xcode Targets with same SPM dependency
My project has multiple targets that the main app is dependent on. ... targets included in a master target to reference a static...
Read more >Consume Swift Package for multiple targets and platforms in a ...
I have a project with multiple targets, such as an iOS app, a watchOS app, and some frameworks. How can I assign the...
Read more >Packaging error-- 'multiple targets%£$%@.....' thoughts greatly ...
Hey-- I am getting this error-- Engine 5 Preview 'UATHelper: Packaging (Windows): ERROR: Multiple game targets found for project.
Read more >Use cases for combined documentation of multiple targets in ...
Hello everyone. I would like kick off a discussion about linking between documentation for multiple targets and hosting documentation for ...
Read more >Fix Unreal Engine "Multiple game targets found for ... - YouTube
For the error: " Multiple game targets found for project. Specify the desired target using the - Target =... argument." during Packaging or ......
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I understand, but callbags is a project built to be fragmented. It’s a good thing, I’ve worked a lot on concentrated projects and they suffer from trying to be everything for everyone. Have you read https://staltz.com/open-source-without-maintainers.html ?
So let’s try this: (1) fork whenever you think something could be better, (2) inform the original repo about the fork (3) update https://github.com/callbag/callbag wiki to mention your published fork, (4) let the strongest fork survive.
I’ll also try to update the readme on -basics to mention other forks of basics. That helps against making people lost.
Have you considered forking? 😃