Add option to streaming calls to filter out one side (receiver or sender) of a payment
See original GitHub issueTake the following call:
var es = server.payments()
.forAccount(accountAddress)
.cursor(lastCursor)
.stream({
onmessage: handler
})
At present, this call will stream both incoming and outgoing payments into the accountAddress
. It would nice to have a call like server.payments.to(accountAddress)
that only shows incoming payments.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:3
- Comments:5 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Broadcasts overview | Android Developers
Apps can receive broadcasts in two ways: through manifest-declared receivers and context-registered receivers. Manifest-declared receivers. If ...
Read more >RFC 3261 SIP: Session Initiation Protocol - IETF
This document describes Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), an application-layer control (signaling) protocol for creating, modifying, and terminating sessions ...
Read more >Block, filter, and report messages on iPhone - Apple Support (IN)
In Messages on iPhone, block unwanted messages, filter messages from unknown senders, and report junk or spam messages.
Read more >Amazon SES email receiving concepts and use cases
When you use Amazon SES as your email receiver, you tell the service what to do with your mail. The primary method, receipt...
Read more >ffmpeg Documentation
5.1 Stream specifiers; 5.2 Generic options; 5.3 AVOptions ... ffmpeg calls the libavformat library (containing demuxers) to read input files and get packets ......
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@RabeaWahab have at it 😃
No, no such filter, and I don’t think it’s worth adding really. I think it’s just syntactic sugar to make life a little easier for devs, but thinking about it more this just doesn’t seem important. If anybody wants to contribute, you’re welcome to. For now I’m closing the issue.