Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Feature request: Linux binaries
See original GitHub issueI did this previously in a different application, see: https://github.com/projectatomic/atomicapp/commit/925fba1b60de59c99b2a6be2ea75e7f8e74298eb
Shouldn’t be too hard to do.
Similar to a project such as https://docs.docker.com/compose/install/ it’d be nice to be able to have a single binary to install instead of having to install Python and have the correct version of it running, etc.
Since we already have pip, .exe’s, it’d be nice to have the appropriate binaries for both Linux + Mac OS X as well.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:12 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
That’s alright, its because I’ve seen somewhere else it required Py <= 3.3 but I can’t find documentation on it anywhere, and instead of posting I tried looking if the was already mentioned somewhere else.
Since the OP is basically asking on the necessity of python either I thought it might relevant. Anyway, Arch is already distributing pre-compiled packages on the main repos.
Has there been any updates on the status of this? I have been trying to create a Mac portable binary/executable to hopefully place a merge for using pyinstaller, however truth be told I am an AWFUL programmer and have made essentially 0 progress 😦.
In addition, Is there any way I can help with this issue?