Please, make a tutorial on how to create simple xenko project using only nuget(without installation of the xenko distribution)
See original GitHub issueOr maybe even better idea is to add custom template(s) to nuget, that could be installed through dotnet new -i Xenko.Game.Template
and used through dotnet new xenkogame
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:8 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Please, make a tutorial on how to create simple xenko ...
Please, make a tutorial on how to create simple xenko project using only nuget(without installation of the xenko distribution) #315.
Read more >Xenko 3.1 Released
Graphics : yes, if you want to make a custom project only using Xenko mathematics or graphics API without the full Xenko engine,...
Read more >Feature Spotlight: Xenko 3.1 + NuGet
NuGet packages will have a xenko folder containing Xenko assets. As a result, user will be able to generate nuget package containing Xenko...
Read more >Video tutorials - Overview and planning
Listing and Source projects for Xenko tutorials. Contribute to Aggror/XenkoTutorials development by creating an account on GitHub.
Read more >Did you know that Stride is basically MonoGame with a 3d ...
Hi, It appears that many people have never heard of the Xenko (soon to be ... It should be quite easy to port...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@rds1983 I couldn’t quickly figure out how to make it work for a netcoreapp, but I managed to have a minimal project for net461 (see attachment: Xnk.zip). Hopefully it can get you started.
See how some libraries are optional (e.g. navigation or physics).
Then we can continue the discussion on the other issue (#80).
@rds1983 There is no need for “please” at all IMO. Use imperative mood, optionally with “Feature request: XXX”
For example:
It is shorter and has all the relevant information. Details should be in the description. 😉