Add upgrading guides
See original GitHub issueLooking at our traffic stats, a search for “Upgrading” is our 5th most visited page on the main repo:
We should add an upgrading guide for v1 -> v2 to the website, which would contain this information: https://github.com/styled-components/styled-components/releases/tag/v2.0.0 (it’s kinda funny because the actual upgrade is a simple npm install
)
We should also make sure that we can add more upgrading guides in the future, i.e. that it’s extensible. (v2 -> v3, v3 -> v4, etc) Maybe we should just post our releases on the website? Is it possible to do that automatically based on the Releases page on GitHub? That’d be awesome for sure…
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:17 (17 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
How to Upgrade a Guide - Guidebook Support
Note: The steps to upgrade detailed below are for guides already purchased, or activated, on the Metered plan. If you have not yet...
Read more >Upgrade Guide - Next.js
Learn how to upgrade Next.js. ... Upgrade Guide. Upgrading from 12 ... Add the legacyBehavior prop to use the legacy behavior or remove...
Read more >Manual: Upgrading Unity
You can still view the version specific guides in their own section of the documentation such as the 2019.1 guide here. Supported Versions....
Read more >New Grounded Update to Armor and Weapon Upgrades
A Complete Guide to the New Upgrade System | New Grounded Update to Armor and Weapon Upgrades. 25K views 5 months ago.
Read more >Upgrading Ruby on Rails
Upgrading Ruby on RailsThis guide provides steps to be followed when you upgrade your applications to a newer version of Ruby on Rails....
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Better ? 😃
I guess, though that’s kinda weird. Maybe we should just get rid of the “Homepage” link (since the logo links there anyway) and add a “Releases” link at the end after “Ecosystem”, that’s probably better?