Collection uniformity

I was checking about Aigle.parallel and I found at least exist 3 methods for do technically the same, but using different input. Specifically I’m referrencing this methods:

- Aigle.all
- Aigle.props

That basically could be expose just in one

- Aigle.parallel

The think I’m suggesting is avoid expose overhead methods for make easy use the same method all the time, because:

• Technically doing the same, so input is a implementation detail.
• Less methods to learn.
• Tiny API.

For example, taking lodash as example, see lodash.forEach method. You can use it for objects or arrays, and it’s so powerful; the point is it is not distinguishing between two methods; just one for Collection an abstraction of data type that include array and object (like Iterable).

What do you think?

[suguru03]

Hi, @Kikobeats ! Aigle.all is the same functionality as Promise.all. Aigle.map is similar to Array#map and Lodash.map, but you can take an async iterator as a second argument.

[Kikobeats]

Another question: Aigle.map === Aigle.all === Promise.all ?