Support for "let"
See original GitHub issue“const” already is at least possible to use, even though it’s the var semantics. Using let though results in a SyntaxError. I think let could at least be supported like const already is even now, full support notwithstanding.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:16 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
let | Can I use... Support tables for HTML5, CSS3, etc - CanIUse
"Can I use" provides up-to-date browser support tables for support of front-end web technologies on desktop and mobile web browsers.
Read more >What browsers currently support JavaScript's 'let' keyword?
All up-to-date major browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, and Edge support the ES2015 (aka "ES6") let keyword. iOS Safari did not support let...
Read more >let - JavaScript - MDN Web Docs
let allows you to declare variables that are limited to the scope of a block statement, or expression on which it is used,...
Read more >Browser Compatibility Testing of JAVASCRIPT let - LambdaTest
BROWSER SUPPORT FOR JAVASCRIPT let · Google Chrome · Mozilla Firefox · Internet Explorer · Safari · Microsoft Edge · Opera.
Read more >Lets Support
Let's Support LLC is a game changer in promotional apparel and accessories. Founded in 1998, Let's Support has decades of experience in manufacturing...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found

I had pretty much totally forgotten about it, started looking at how tests work just now. I probably should have taken svaarala’s offer up last year, but if I don’t find time to whip some basic tests/doc up by monday I’ll just open a PR with what I had and leave the rest up to them… Sorry for the delay!
We miss let in the parser. Could we just define let as an alias vor var keyword, so most cases just work fine?