Consider renaming preload
See original GitHub issueThere’s a browser feature called preload
, which Sapper/kit supports: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Preloading_content
It’s been confusing on a number of occasions that we’ve overloaded this term. This might be a good opportunity to consider naming
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:11 (10 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Renaming anything in Godot should rename their references
When renaming any kind of object in Godot, it should find all occurrences in ... names for the changed scene/node, like "load(), preload(),...
Read more >Naming Devices in JAMF--AppleTV and IPads
The best thing about it is that if someone changes the name of the device, it will force back into whatever is in...
Read more >Preloading fonts using angular CLI - Stack Overflow
However angular hashes my fonts during the build process, so my font will be copied to the root folder and renamed to look...
Read more >Preloading files in Assets folder - Help - OpenFL Community
I have this line in my project.xml file: <assets path="Assets" rename="assets" exclude="*.swf" /> Is preload=“false” the default value or do ...
Read more >3 ways to do eager loading (preloading) in Rails 3, 4, 5 and 6
table names. So #includes delegates the job to #eager_load . You can always achieve the same result by using the #eager_load method directly....
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
It could be as simple as
getProps
.Personally I’m inclined to leave
preload
as-is for now, because there’s lots of ideas floating around about how we could improve the API itself, and it’d nice to be able to introduce a replacement while deprecatingpreload
in a non-breaking way, which is harder if we rename the function without changing the API.closing in favour of #268