svelte-loader@3.0.0 breaks emitCss?
See original GitHub issueHello!
I have a simple MPA project that I’m working on using Webpack 4.
Here’s the webpack.config.js
that I used:
const path = require('path');
const glob = require('glob');
const HardSourceWebpackPlugin = require('hard-source-webpack-plugin');
const MiniCssExtractPlugin = require('mini-css-extract-plugin');
const UglifyJsPlugin = require('uglifyjs-webpack-plugin');
const OptimizeCSSAssetsPlugin = require('optimize-css-assets-webpack-plugin');
const CopyWebpackPlugin = require('copy-webpack-plugin');
module.exports = (env, options) => {
const devMode = options.mode !== 'production';
return {
optimization: {
minimizer: [
new UglifyJsPlugin({ cache: true, parallel: true, sourceMap: devMode }),
new OptimizeCSSAssetsPlugin({})
]
},
entry: {
'app': glob.sync('./vendor/**/*.js').concat(['./js/app.js']),
'app2': glob.sync('./vendor/**/*.js').concat(['./js/app2.js']),
},
output: {
filename: '[name].js',
chunkFilename: '[name].[id].js',
path: path.resolve(__dirname, '../priv/static/js'),
publicPath: '/js/'
},
resolve: {
alias: {
svelte: path.resolve('node_modules', 'svelte')
},
extensions: ['.mjs', '.js', '.svelte'],
mainFields: ['svelte', 'browser', 'module', 'main'],
},
devtool: devMode ? 'eval-cheap-module-source-map' : undefined,
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.(html|svelte)$/,
exclude: /node_modules/,
use: {
loader: 'svelte-loader',
options: {
emitCss: true,
},
},
},
{
test: /\.js$/,
exclude: /node_modules/,
use: {
loader: 'babel-loader'
}
},
{
test: /\.[s]?css$/,
use: [
MiniCssExtractPlugin.loader,
{
loader: 'css-loader',
options: {
url: false,
},
},
'sass-loader',
],
}
]
},
plugins: [
new MiniCssExtractPlugin({ filename: '../css/[name].css' }),
new CopyWebpackPlugin([{ from: 'static/', to: '../' }])
]
.concat(devMode ? [new HardSourceWebpackPlugin()] : [])
}
};
js/app2.js
is then something along the lines of:
import css from "../css/app2.scss";
import "phoenix_html"
import App from './ui/App.svelte';
const app = new App({
target: document.body,
props: {
name: 'Hello GitHub'
}
});
window.app = app;
export default app;
So I am not sure what’s going wrong here but using svelte-loader@3.0.0 causes the following issue during webpack --mode development
:
ERROR in ./js/ui/App.svelte
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve '/Users/lkurusa/src/x/app/assets/js/ui/App.svelte.0.css' in '/Users/lkurusa/src/x/app/assets/js/ui'
resolve '/Users/lkurusa/src/x/app/assets/js/ui/App.svelte.0.css' in '/Users/lkurusa/src/x/app/assets/js/ui'
using description file: /Users/lkurusa/src/x/app/assets/package.json (relative path: ./js/ui)
using description file: /Users/lkurusa/src/x/app/assets/package.json (relative path: ./js/ui/App.svelte.0.css)
no extension
/Users/lkurusa/src/x/app/assets/js/ui/App.svelte.0.css doesn't exist
.js
/Users/lkurusa/src/x/app/assets/js/ui/App.svelte.0.css.js doesn't exist
.json
/Users/lkurusa/src/x/app/assets/js/ui/App.svelte.0.css.json doesn't exist
as directory
/Users/lkurusa/src/x/app/assets/js/ui/App.svelte.0.css doesn't exist
[/Users/lkurusa/src/x/app/assets/js/ui/App.svelte.0.css]
[/Users/lkurusa/src/x/app/assets/js/ui/App.svelte.0.css.js]
[/Users/lkurusa/src/x/app/assets/js/ui/App.svelte.0.css.json]
@ ./js/ui/App.svelte 42:0-43:1
@ ./js/app2.js
@ multi ./js/app2.js
Reverting svelte-loader to 2.13.6
fixes the issue.
Maybe I’m doing something wrong - I’m not really a web developer. 😃
Thanks!
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:5 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
No results found
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
It appears that upgrading Webpack has resolved this issue. 😃 Thanks @non25 for your help!
Hi, I haven’t yet had the chance to look at this, sorry. I’ll take a look later today and get back here.