Add `controls` attribute alongside connector form definitions
See original GitHub issueIdeally we should just define the control order as part of the form definition, otherwise this switch/case is gonna get kinda big:
https://github.com/syndesisio/syndesis/pull/1202/files#diff-28b4a582e947fd283b192ca194ed84b5R48
So next to properties
I propose having controls
which is an array of ids from the properties
map, the UI can use this in several places to guarantee the control order of forms.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:8 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Basic native form controls - Learn web development | MDN
This Boolean attribute lets you specify that the element should automatically have input focus when the page loads. Only one form-associated ...
Read more >Understanding Success Criterion 3.3.2: Labels or Instructions
The intent of this Success Criterion is to have content authors present instructions or labels that identify the controls in a form so...
Read more >Tutorial - Customize Azure Active Directory attribute mappings ...
With attribute -mappings, you control how attributes are populated in a third-party SaaS application. There are four different mapping types ...
Read more >HTML Form Attributes - W3Schools
The method attribute specifies the HTTP method to be used when submitting the form data. The form-data can be sent as URL variables...
Read more >Using JavaScript and forms | InfoWorld
As with the radio button object, add a CHECKED attribute to the HTML markup for that check box you wish to be initially...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
so let’s have
Ordered
?Lemme reopen this and get a PR for the UI side of things, then this can be closed.