Add new sibling job in flow at runtime
See original GitHub issueAs a worker, I’d like to be able to inject a new job into a flow at the same level as the current job (same parentId) I tried just creating a new job with the same parentId via JobsOptions.parent but the parent job still ran before the new child. Any advice on how to get my desired behavior?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:8
Top Results From Across the Web
Flows and Subflows | MuleSoft Documentation
Mule applications are built around one or more flows. Typically, a Mule application begins processing a message it receives at an inbound endpoint...
Read more >Adjacent sibling combinator - CSS: Cascading Style Sheets
The adjacent sibling combinator ( + ) separates two selectors and matches the second element only if it immediately follows the first element, ......
Read more >Multi-node parallel jobs - AWS Batch
You can use multi-node parallel jobs to run single jobs that span multiple Amazon EC2 instances. With AWS Batch multi-node parallel jobs, ...
Read more >Azkaban 3.0 Documentation
Previous Flow/Jobs - Search through previous executions of jobs and flows as well as access ... added to Azkaban properties during runtime for...
Read more >java - How to programmatically add views and constraints to a ...
ConstraintLayout layout = (ConstraintLayout) findViewById(R.id.mainConstraint); ConstraintSet set = new ConstraintSet(); set.clone(layout); ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found

hi @blankenshipz, I modified your first example a little bit, there were some data that were passed in an incorrect way:
this one is working
As we have a pattern to handle step jobs, this issue could be closed I think