Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

matchers.contains(number) support

See original GitHub issue

Given this repro snippet

const td = require('testdouble')

const repro = td.function()
repro([1])
td.verify(repro(td.matchers.contains(1)))

I’d like this to succeed, but currently it throws an exception “Error: Error: testdouble.js - td.matchers.contains - this matcher only supports strings, arrays, and plain objects”

I think to fix this is just a matter of or _.isNumber(containing) on https://github.com/testdouble/testdouble.js/blob/30e27f54de0e84fe99a9c33340a0474c3a21369b/src/matchers/index.coffee#L45

Issue Analytics

State:
Created 7 years ago
Comments:6 (3 by maintainers)

Top GitHub Comments

1reaction

searlscommented, Apr 29, 2016

Check out the update in 1.4.2 and let me know if that works for you

0reactions

focusauruscommented, Apr 29, 2016

Yes, no more exception! Thanks for the quick fix. Been getting a lot of mileage out of testdouble recently.

Top Results From Across the Web

Using Hamcrest Number Matchers - Baeldung

A quick and practical guide to Hamcrest Number matchers. ... Hamcrest provides static matchers to help make unit test assertions simpler and ...

Matchers (Hamcrest)

Creates a matcher that matches arrays whose elements are satisfied by the specified matchers. Matches positively only if the number of matchers specified...

MATCH function - Microsoft Support

The MATCH function searches for a specified item in a range of cells, and then returns the relative position of that item in...

googletest/matchers.md at main - GitHub

Contains (e).Times(n), argument contains elements that match e , which can be either a value or a matcher, and the number of matches...

Hamcrest Matchers.contains matcher not working (?)

I tried do it using excellent Hamcrest matching classes, by combining contains with Matchers.hasToString , but somehow, its Matchers.contains is ...