Targets' `add_target(s)` methods do not correctly check passed paths
See original GitHub issueDescription of issue or feature request:
Judging from the docstrings and comments, add_target
and add_targets
are expected to update a Targets
object with passed target paths, if they are relative to a targets directory base path (i.e. self._targets_directory
).
However, they don’t seem to take into account that Python’s os.path.join
ignores all path component arguments prior to a component that looks like an absolute path.
Current behavior:
- Works as expected (?) if passed target path is relative to a targets directory base path or absolute but falls into the targets directory:
# repo._targets_directory == "/path/to/repo/targets"
repo.targets.add_target("foo.txt")
repo.targets.add_target("/path/to/repo/targets/bar.txt)
# Successfully adds "foo.txt" and "bar.txt"
- Fails if the passed target path is not absolute and does not exist relative to targets directory base path “/path/to/repo/targets”.
# repo._targets_directory == "/path/to/repo/targets"
repo.targets.add_target("repo/targets/foo.txt")
# Fails with "'/path/to/repo/targets/repo/targets/foo.txt' is not a valid file in the repository's targets directory"
- Fails if the passed target path is absolute and does not exist
#repo._targets_directory == "/path/to/repo/targets"
repo.targets.add_target("/path/does/not/exist/foo.txt")
# Fails with "'/path/does/not/exist/foo.txt' is not a valid file in the repository's targets directory"
- Has unexpected behavior if the passed path is absolute and exists!
Expected behavior: Revise intended behavior, update implementation accordingly.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:6 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Target groups for your Application Load Balancers
Each target group is used to route requests to one or more registered targets. ... The load balancer does not validate these certificates....
Read more >swift - Different behavior between addTarget and ...
Adding a target to something like UIGestureRecognizer or UIButton only passes one parameter to the selected function.
Read more >addTarget:action:forControlEvents - Apple Developer
Associates a target object and action method with the control.
Read more >2 Discovering, Promoting, and Adding Targets
From the Setup menu, select Manage Cloud Control, and then click Agents. Click the required Management Agent. Verify whether the Management Agent is...
Read more >When to use target="_blank" | CSS-Tricks
Anchor links1 may have a target attribute which controls what happens when that link is clicked. One of the possible values of that ......
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
This feels like a sensible approach, that handles @lukpueh’s least-surprise concerns above and we can address my debugability concern with appropriate logging.
I agree with your debugging concern, @joshuagl. I am concerned with least surprise. 😃
To me, and this should answer your other question, none of above cases seems fully surprise-free. Here are some concerns:
self._targets_directory
), whose portion in the path gets stripped anyway?