Non-blocking resolution of variables assumes mutable model
See original GitHub issueThe following commit (3601af0b2) assumes that the Map
model provided by Spring Framework is mutable (it is not). This has been raised and is currently discussed in SPR-17407.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
The Python Language Reference | Matthew Towers' homepage
The description of exactly what things are called mutable is a little confusing. At first: “Objects whose values can change are called mutable, ......
Read more >Be Aware of the Traps of Condition Variables - Modernes C++
Today, I write a scary post about condition variables. You should be aware of these issues of condition variables. The C++ core guideline...
Read more >Chapter 9. Concurrency with Shared Variables
Our concurrent, duplicate-suppressing, non-blocking cache is complete. The implementation of Memo above uses a mutex to guard a map variable that is shared...
Read more >Java concurrency (multi-threading) - Tutorial - Vogella.com
The Java memory model guarantees that each thread entering a synchronized block of code sees the effects of all previous modifications that were...
Read more >Web on Reactive Stack - Spring
At the programming-model level, Java 8 enabled Spring WebFlux to offer ... WebFlux (and non-blocking servers in general), it is assumed that ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Ah, silly me. Yes you’re right, this is done on the functional side only with
DefaultRenderingResponseBuilder
.Already in
3.0.11-SNAPSHOT