xsampa.py lack of license
See original GitHub issuepraatio/utilities/xsampa.py
is listed as “does not carry any license”. IANAL, but my understanding is that without any license, no one has permission to use it. It may be included in the source of the project with permission, but without an explicit license for the file no one else can know exactly how they are allowed to use it, if at all. Is there any way to contact the author and get a specific license for the file, such as MIT like the main project?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:6 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
dmort27/epitran: A tool for transcribing orthographic ... - GitHub
The Python modules epitran and epitran.vector can be used to easily write more ... because of licensing restrictions cannot be distributed with Epitran)....
Read more >Is there a tool for conversion of IPA into X-Sampa?
This tool allows for two-way conversion between IPA and X-SAMPA. Share.
Read more >Supported phonemes and levels of stress - Google Cloud
The tables below list the phonemes and levels of stress available for each language that supports the <phoneme> SSML tag. You can use...
Read more >Mlphon: A Multifunctional Grapheme-Phoneme ... - IEEE Xplore
ABSTRACT In this article we present the design and the development of a knowledge based computational linguistic tool, Mlphon.
Read more >the automatic annotation and analysis of speech - sppas.org
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 ... proposed in the chapter “Scripting with Python and SPPAS”. 1.3.4 Update....
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@timmahrt Sorry, I am not a lawyer. I really don’t know what would be considered sufficient in this case. Removing it is probably safe if we doesn’t want to put either a license on his site or a new version of the file with a license in the file itself. If he wants other people to use his code then providing a license would facilitate that, but that is up to him.
If its ok, I’ll close this issue. All of the unlicensed code has been removed.
Please feel free to open it for further discussion.