Package’s name
See original GitHub issueNow that the package is being renamed (#21), should we consider a shorter name? I found that the following are unused in npm:
- hook-setter
- set-hook(s)
- add-hook(s)
- install-hook(s)
- hookful
- hookize
- hookish
For example, set-hooks would work well as a command: npx set-hooks
. On the other hand, it would’t be so good property name in package.json
.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:5 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Package names - The Go Programming Language
Well-named packages make it easier to find the code you need. Effective Go provides guidelines for naming packages, types, functions, and ...
Read more >Naming a Package (The Java™ Tutorials > Learning the Java ...
Package names are written in all lower case to avoid conflict with the names of classes or interfaces. Companies use their reversed Internet...
Read more >SQL package names - IBM
The package names are generated according to the attributes currently used by the database server. Package name if not a Db2 for i...
Read more >Creative Package Names Ideas
Creative Package Names Ideas ; Titan Packaging, Break Time ; Master Paper Box, Package Group ; Premier Packaging, Every Angle Success ; Peek ......
Read more >When retrieving a package using the package's name ...
We can retrieve the package using the "Package Names" section in Workbench. 7) Observe the CustomLabels section is included into the retrieved ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
What about git-hookie? It’s more explicit and still short.
The diminutive suffix -ie, referring to littleness, and the simplicity have something in common, at least in my opinion. So a simple hook = a hookie. Maybe the name should be git-hookies then.
I like the original name and the renaming was done by the time we had this issue opened, so I decided to leave the name as it is.