Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Enable experimental_python_types by default and change the name
See original GitHub issueDescribe the feature
Enable experimental_python_types by default.
Change this parameter name to legacy_python_types.
Describe alternatives you’ve considered
No response
Are you willing to submit PR?
- Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 9 months ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:8 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
PEP 8 – Style Guide for Python Code
The default wrapping in most tools disrupts the visual structure of the code ... Module level “dunders” (i.e. names with two leading and...
Read more >Python Type Checking (Guide) - Real Python
In this guide, you'll look at Python type checking. Traditionally, types have been handled by the Python interpreter in a flexible but implicit...
Read more >Configuration | Documentation | Poetry - Python dependency ...
Configuration Poetry can be configured via the config command (see more about its usage here) or directly in the config.toml file that will...
Read more >Editing Python in Visual Studio Code
This enables import statements to be automatically added as you type. Auto imports are disabled by default, but you can enable them by...
Read more >Options and settings for Python - Visual Studio (Windows)
The Experimental group contains options for features that are ... Color names based on types, On, Enables syntax coloring in Python code.
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Sounds good to me, I’m not in favour of
raw_resultsname,untyped_resultsis better or maybelegacy_untyped_results?Also as a part of this we should make sure we document clearly the limitations of the new default and mention how to workaround them when needed.