Code always evaluates to true during root updating
See original GitHub issueUnless I’m missing something, this line of code always evaluate to true
:
The reason is that there’s a logical-or comparison to above_sample[c]
, which has already evaluated to true
.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:5 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Why does "a == x or y or z" always evaluate to True? How can ...
Since at least one of "John" and "Inbar" is not an empty string, the whole expression always returns True! The solution: a =...
Read more >AP Computer Science A Final Exam Review Flashcards - Quizlet
Each variable was assigned true if the answer was correct and false if the answer was incorrect. Which of the following code segments...
Read more >Code Inspection: Expression is always 'true' or always 'false'
This inspection is fairly obvious: ReSharper analyzes values and nullability, integer arithmetics, and so on, and suggests eliminating expressions that are ...
Read more >This condition will always return 'false' since the types have no ...
While the error claims "This condition will always return 'false'" it in fact evaluates to true. This is incredibly misleading. Playground Link ...
Read more >Types of SQL Injection Attacks
Tautologies : An attacker injects queries that always evaluates to true to the Grade Central site to bypass authentication and retrieve grades. Retrieving...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
I had deleted that comment. It is wrong. The loop executed once the vast majority of the time, but not always.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 1:26 AM Jerome Kelleher notifications@github.com wrote:
Important note from @molpopgen (which doesn’t seem to have shown up here):