Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Rename 'master' branch to something else?
See original GitHub issueSee this register article for useful background. I think for the large projects like this one (and msprime) it makes sense to change the default branch name.
I think it makes sense to also change to something more descriptive. How about development? This describes our workflow more accurately, and would have the advantage of emphasising to people that the Git version is the development version, and they should use the tagged releases unless they explicitly want the dev version.
Any thoughts on different names? Any objections to doing this in the first place?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:14 (14 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
All done, closing.
The poll clearly chose
main. I propose we make the switch on the 28th, to give a little warning.