Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Reflex and Trendflex Question
See original GitHub issueI was comparing the implementations of Reflex and Trendflex in pandas-ta to their implementations on https://www.prorealcode.com/prorealtime-indicators/reflex-and-trendflex-indicators-john-f-ehlers/. There appears to have been an extra 0.5 * added in front of close[i - 1] here, https://github.com/twopirllc/pandas-ta/blob/development/pandas_ta/trend/trendflex.py#L67. Also, the original implementation of both Reflex and Trendflex used 10 for smooth, instead of 20. Did you find 20 to provide better results?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:9 (9 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
Hi @CMobley7,
Oops! Please try the development branch instead. Speed improvements, docs, typing, et al.
Thanks, KJ
@twopirllc, if I’m wrong let me know. If not, let me know if you want me to put in a pull request or if @rengel8 should do it. Also, no need to apologize. Your library is amazing. Thanks for all the time you’ve put into making it what it is!