Run error standard_init_linux.go:211: exec user process caused "exec format error"
See original GitHub issueWhen I follow the tutorial of https://nashosted.com/youtubedl-material-a-self-hosted-youtube-video-downloader/ , and install with the command
$ docker run -d --name YouTubeDL-Material \
-v /your/appdata/location:/app/appdata \
-v /your/audio/location:/app/audio \
-v /your/video/location:/app/video \
-v /your/subscriptions/location:/app/subscriptions \
-v /your/users/location:/app/users \
-p 8998:17442 \
tzahi12345/youtubedl-material:latest
I got an error standard_init_linux.go:211: exec user process caused "exec format error"
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:9 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
standard_init_linux.go:211: exec user process caused "exec ...
I am building the Dockerfile for python script which will run in minikube windows 10 system below is my Dockerfile. Building ...
Read more >Docker fails to start with "standard_init_linux.go:219: exec ...
Docker fails to start with "standard_init_linux.go:219: exec user process caused: exec format error" #69. Open. DatDucati opened this issue on ...
Read more >exec user process caused "exec format error" - YouTube
PYTHON : standard_init_linux. go : 211 : exec user process caused " exec format error " [ Gift : Animated Search Engine ...
Read more >docker container failed standard_init_linux.go:228: exec user ...
Docker throws standard_init_linux.go:228: exec user process caused: exec format error when there are issues with running executable file. Favicon for linkedin.
Read more >Fix: standard_init_linux.go:228: exec user process caused
When there are problems with the executable file format, Docker throws the error standard_init_linux.go:228: exec user process caused: exec ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Sorry to re-open this. Just a head’s up that at least for my docker images, they are hit and miss. I build them for fun/learning.
That being said, I’ve found that it’s better to run youtubedl-material on a non arm architecture. There are quirks with how arm handle passing of values and variables that make some of the core features of YTDL-material fail (e.g. downloading a playlist).
Just my 2 cents.
Got around to testing the image today. So far so good:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 2:24 PM Tzahi12345 notifications@github.com wrote: