question-mark
Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

Make Backoffice validation less "aggressive" when saving content

See original GitHub issue

As a general rule people are using red validation message when submitting a form/whatever to show the user that an error occurred and that no action was performed.

However, when you Save a content node in Umbraco without filling out mandatory properties, we’re showing red validation messages (and turning the Save button into an X!) even though the content was actually saved.

Since I’ve been using Umbraco for quite a while now I know that the content was saved… but if you’re new to the CMS you might not be aware of this.

But why didn’t you just fill it out? It’s mandatory! Because sometimes when I create/set up a page I don’t have all the info right now… So I save the node so I can return to it later.

I’m confident that we can avoid confusing editors by making the validation more friendly when you’re “just” saving a node. 🙂

ku50EBAtQ4

Issue Analytics

  • State:closed
  • Created 4 years ago
  • Reactions:2
  • Comments:7 (7 by maintainers)

github_iconTop GitHub Comments

3reactions
kjaccommented, Jan 22, 2020

What @Shazwazza said 😛

@nielslyngsoe I believe you should put on your UX glasses and come up with a grand plan to aim for with this. Then based on that we could identify the correct course of action.

1reaction
nielslyngsoecommented, Jan 21, 2020

Great feedback!

The first and maybe most important change would be to change the Save-button response to a checkmark so you can see that the save was successful. Then we should display a notification, in green, saying “Content was saved but it contains invalid content”.

A quick thought could be to use our yellow color for the feedback messages, this could be an easy way to make the errors appear less aggressive, but still visible.

Read more comments on GitHub >

github_iconTop Results From Across the Web

v8.14.0
Create explicit scope for mappers in UmbracoMapper. UI and UX updates (14). Make Backoffice validation less "aggressive" when saving content ...
Read more >
How to add validation on Save action in backoffice
You have to write render class for your's fields in editor area.With render class and ZK action events to able to validate the...
Read more >
Umbraco back office save validation
How to customize regex validation messages in backoffice? 1 · Validation Message not displaying when submitting non-valid form (ASP.NET Umbraco).
Read more >
Validation Service in Backoffice Framework
The purpose of the validation framework is to verify data before you save it and to notify you about any violations to the...
Read more >
Customer experience:
Making the right diagnosis of your customer experiences. The complexity of dealing with customers, channels, and competitors is only growing. Getting.
Read more >

github_iconTop Related Medium Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related StackOverflow Question

No results found

github_iconTroubleshoot Live Code

Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free

github_iconTop Related Reddit Thread

No results found

github_iconTop Related Hackernoon Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related Tweet

No results found

github_iconTop Related Dev.to Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related Hashnode Post

No results found