Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
HashCode Accident
See original GitHub issueI think the second line here should say result = prime * result + (dataMap())
Cheers!
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:6 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
The 3 things you should know about hashCode()
Whenever two different objects have the same hash code, we call this a collision. A collision is nothing critical, it just means that...
Read more >Java hashcode() strings collision - Stack Overflow
We have a "collision" if two different non-equal objects have the same hashcode. This may be a problem, for example when try to...
Read more >Java HashCode Collision: How uniform is it's distribution?
Well this article is on java hashcode collision generated on on more or less similar message contents. Following program will explain this :...
Read more >Guide to hashCode() in Java - Baeldung
This situation is commonly known as a hash collision, and various methods exist for handling it, with each one having their pros and...
Read more >Java equals() and hashCode() - DigitalOcean
The phenomenon when two keys have same hash code is called hash collision. If hashCode() method is not implemented properly, there will be ......
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
It’s not a dumb mistake, it rather shows it should document what’s going on. In fact it is an optimization avoiding the recalculation of the hash code.
You’re right, dumb mistake on my part!