Automatic Flow tests for OSGi
See original GitHub issue@denis-anisimov commented on Mon Jun 04 2018
Similar task for FW: https://github.com/vaadin/framework/issues/8594
Note that the implementation of the task in FW contains only smoke tests and also tests custom GWT widgetset which is not applicable for Flow.
It would be nice to run the same tests in the flow-tests
module in OSGi container.
At least flow-tests/test-root-context
.
But I’m not sure whether it’s possible. At least smoke tests and test which validates all OSGi specific functionality implemented in Flow should be provided.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:7 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Initial OSGi support for Flow · Issue #455 · vaadin/flow - GitHub
I have previously used the UIProvider and ViewProvider to allow me to provide Vaadin with the DS managed objects (using prototype scope to...
Read more >Chapter 11. Testing OSGi based Applications - Spring
A useful feature of the testing framework represents the automatic creation of the test manifest based on the test bundle content. The manifest...
Read more >How to test OSGi Applications? - JavaBeat
This method of testing OSGi applications always feels a little inelegant to us, but it can work really well as a pragmatic test...
Read more >Vaadin OSGi Support | Integrations | Flow - Vaadin
To deploy Vaadin applications as OSGi bundles, static resources must be published using the appropriate APIs.
Read more >Rapid test-driven development with continuous testing - bnd
This is a quick “tip” post about the continuous testing feature of Bnd(tools), which can help in this area by significantly speeding up...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Karaf is a customized container whereas Felix is general and applicable to a much larger audience. Without commenting on using Karaf for IT it would be of value to use Felix as the main container for future OSGi documentation and tutorials etc…
There is nightly build configuration “Flow Felix Jetty OSGi Boot Integration Tests” on bender.