Group are not flexible enough

Hello @icebob @jmverges @dflock I’m late to the party and I didn’t really follow the work on groups. Since working on #257 , I’m exposed to how group work and I have noticed a flaw in the current design. I can’t alternate freely between single field and group. The only possibility is fields -> groups. I can’t do the inverse (ex. groups -> fields) or anything else (ex. field -> group -> field -> group -> group -> field) My goal is not to spit on everyone hard work, but I wonder if they can be a better more flexible way to do this. Why a type: group was not used ?

fields: [{
    type: "input",
    inputType: "text",
    label: "Single field (without group)",
    model: "single"
}, {
    type: "group",
    legend: "Contact Details",
    fields: [{
        type: "input",
        inputType: "text",
        label: "Name",
        model: "name"
    }, {
        type: "input",
        inputType: "email",
        label: "Email",
        model: "email"
    }]
}, {
    type: "group",
    legend: "Other Details",
    fields: [{
        type: "input",
        inputType: "text",
        label: "More",
        model: "others.more"
    }, {
        type: "input",
        inputType: "text",
        label: "Things",
        model: "others.things"
    }]
}]

Thanks for the feedback.

[jamestowers]

This would be a nice feature, you could potentially set the group tag and className so you’re confined to fieldset, eg:

type: "group",
legend: "User details",
tag: "div",
className: "col-6 md-col-12",
fields: [{...}]

[cincarnato]

I really need this group { className: “col-6 md-col-12”, fields: […