[wdio-junit-reporter] optional "system-out" by setting configuration, make reporter more clear and simple
See original GitHub issuewhen i get a junit-reporter, it containes many system-out
information, that make me difficult to read the reporter.
What I want to:
the xml file of the reporter just outputs like the example of webdriverio’s document without system-out
label by setting configuration.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:11 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Junit Reporter - WebdriverIO
A WebdriverIO reporter that creates Jenkins compatible XML based JUnit reports. ... The easiest way is to keep @wdio/junit-reporter as a devDependency in ......
Read more >cypress-multi-reporters - npm package - Snyk
Configuring reporters. Set the reporters configuration using --reporter-options configFile=config.json . Include reporters in reporterEnabled as a ...
Read more >WebDriverIO - Junit Reporter - QAFox
Junit Reporter is a WebdriverIO reporter that creates Jenkins compatible ... Junit Reporter is simple and very clear in telling test case execution...
Read more >@wdio/junit-reporter | Yarn - Package Manager
@wdio/junit-reporter. owner webdriverio643kMIT8.0.13TS vulns 0 vulnerabilities. A WebdriverIO reporter that creates Jenkins compatible XML based JUnit ...
Read more >Testing web applications using Mocha and WebdriverIO
reporters : ['spec', ['junit', { outputDir: './', outputFileFormat: function(options) { // optional return `results.xml` } }] ], ... Before ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
@Primajin mind raising a new issue for this as I guess this is different from what the original poster had in mind. Bascially you are saying the reporter is unable to store large amount of data in the file, right?
get it! i really appreciate your patience, thank you for your advice.