historyApiFallback breaks with 2.1.0-beta.7 and 2.1.0-beta.6
See original GitHub issueBefore with this configuration the index file was served with 200.html since I’ve updated not anymore. Went through the PRs and documentation again I can’t see what’s wrong.
I’ll just stick to beta.5 for now 👍
historyApiFallback: {
index: '200.html'
}
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:11 (10 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Invalid configuration object. Webpack has been initialised ...
npm install webpack@2.1.0-beta.22 --save-dev. Then you should be able to gulp again. Fixed the issue for me.
Read more >options has an unknown property 'hotonly'. these properties are ...
I receive an error message: Invalid configuration object. Webpack has been initialized using a configuration object that does ...
Read more >Dependencies | webpack-dev-server - Open Source Insights
arrow_right ansi‑html. 0.0.7 Notes 1 advisory Relation Licenses
Version 0.0.7 Published January 2, 2017 Description Advisories in this pack...
arrow_right bonjour. 3.5.0 Notes Relation Licenses
Version...
Read more >projet3 - CodeSandbox
abab. ^2.0.0 (2.0.5) · accepts. ^1.3.5 (1.3.7) · acorn. ^6.0.5 (6.4.2) · acorn-dynamic-import. ^3.0.0 (3.0.0) · acorn-globals. ^4.3.0 (4.3.4) · acorn-jsx. ^5.0.1 ( ......
Read more >NOTICE.pdf - NetApp Cloud Central
2.1.1. MIT License. @azure/ms-rest-azure-env. 1.1.2. MIT License ... eclaration 7.0.0-beta.46 ... 7. @babel/plugin-proposal-nulli sh-coalescing-operator.
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found

Never mind, found the issue and added a failing test.
@aves84, would you have time to look into this? #617 broke this (I don’t blame you, at the time of this PR there weren’t any tests). There are some unit tests for this now, so it would be easier.
This probably has to do with #617. Where does the
200.htmlfile come from? Is it served through thecontentBaseoption or from a webpack loader / plugin?