Support topic with multiple schemas
See original GitHub issueI am trying to use this connector with the topic with multiple schemas. The problem is the subject name for schema is topic-record
where this code is hard coded to topic-value
. Are you going to support that kind of scenarios?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:6 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Multiple Event Types in the Same Kafka Topic - Revisited
Schema Registry now supports schema references in Confluent Platform 5.5, and this blog post presents an alternative means of putting ...
Read more >One or more schemas per topic when using Schema Registry ...
Typically you have 1:1 topic/schema relationship, but it is possible (and valid) to have multiple schemas per topic in some situations.
Read more >Multi schemas in one Kafka topic -
Supporting multiple schemas per associated topic (again, topics themselves are oblivious to the notion of a schema) fixes a bug in Confluent ...
Read more >2 Different Schemas on the same topic? : r/apachekafka - Reddit
It's not a problem to use different schemas on one topic. The bigger question is: how to ensure the two consumer groups each...
Read more >Managing Schemas - Kafka Topology Builder documentation
Multiple schemas support per topic¶ ... It is possible to setup multiple schemas per topic, this is a common use case when using...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Thank you for the clarification, this makes a lot more sense to me now!
As the schema-registry already supports this, I’m in support of adding this feature to KCBQ. We’d be happy to review and merge your changes if you wanted to implement this.
Great! Expect a PR soon 😃