Feature request: New level option
See original GitHub issueThanks for providing this fantastic module.
Would be great to know if is possible to consider a new level
option in order to segregate logs per level. Like in the standard Winston File transport:
new transports.File({ filename: 'error.log', level: 'error' })
Thank you!
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Feature Requests: What are they and how to manage them
Feature requests are a form of product feedback you may frequently encounter as a SaaS product manager. They typically come in the form...
Read more >7 Useful Tips to Manage Feature Requests - Craft.io
Feature requests can provide product managers with great ideas for product improvement, but they must be managed correctly. Here are our top tips....
Read more >Feature Request - Allow Product and Services Selection when ...
Solved: Hello, I'm currently working on syncing up our CoConstruct page with our QuickBooks transactions. CoConstruct leverages the Product ...
Read more >Is this the right forum for feature requests?
Solved: Hi, just wondering how new features should be requested, voted on etc. ... Your best options: feedback link inside the application ...
Read more >10 Tips for Responding Graciously to Customer Feature ...
Picture this scenario: A customer requests a feature. Support politely tells them that it can't be done while still providing top quality service....
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
This should already work - please re-open if you find it does not.
I must be missing something here - the following code works as expected here. Can you please try this and let me know if you see similar results?