Question: WithBody can't be used with multiple matching rules?
See original GitHub issueStuck with a question: is it possible to use several matching rules for request body?
WithParam(…) from IParamsRequestBuilder as well as WithHeader(…) from IHeadersAndCookiesRequestBuilder support smth like:
foreach (var matcher in ParamMatchers)
{
request.WithParam(matcher.Key, MatchBehaviour.AcceptOnMatch, matcher.Value.ToArray());
}
since it intakes key.
But for WithBody(…) from IRequestBuilder can’t do smth similar.
How can I deal with several matching rules for request body?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:7
Top Results From Across the Web
Cannot match url with dynamic path variable when used ...
It doesn't work if I use Wiremock in tandem with WireMockRestServiceServer (spring-cloud-contract). Working code - with Wiremock alone @Rule ...
Read more >Unable to activate matching rule that identifies duplicate ...
Result: The matching rule will fail to activate because the number of match keys with 100+ dupes is more than 2% of the...
Read more >CRS rule groups and rules - Azure Web Application Firewall
Custom rules are always applied before rules in the Core Rule Set are evaluated. If a request matches a custom rule, the corresponding...
Read more >Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) | Anatomical Sciences
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) · 2. Is it necessary to include a body donation in the donor's will? · 3. Are there age...
Read more >How to set the matching rule for any 3 email fields matches?
2 Answers. Unfortunately Salesforce matching rules will not compare one field to a different field (like Email 1 field against Email 2 field), ......
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found

In some hours.
Got it, thanks. For now I don’t see any reason for doing it.
Anyway, I’m happy with this change.
Do you have eta when it will be available in stable?