WireMock with JUnit 5
See original GitHub issueIn JUnit 5, @Rule
and @ClassRule
is superseded by @ExtendWith
, which requires extension class.
And it seems like extension for WireMock is not yet supported.
Is there any alternative way to use WireMock with stubbing and verification via JUnit 5?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:71
- Comments:64 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
JUnit 5+ Jupiter - WireMock
The JUnit Jupiter extension simplifies running of one or more WireMock instances in a Jupiter test class. It supports two modes of operation...
Read more >Testing Spring Boot Application using WireMock and JUnit 5
WireMock is a library for stubbing and mocking web services. It constructs an HTTP server that acts as an actual web service. In...
Read more >Integration Tests with WireMock and JUnit 5 - LinkedIn
Overview As per WireMock, is a simulator for HTTP-based APIs. Some might consider it a Service Virtualization tool or a Mock Server.
Read more >Spring Boot Integration Tests With WireMock and JUnit 5
This article showcases a testing recipe for writing integration tests for Spring Boot applications using WireMock and JUnit.
Read more >WireMock JUnit 5 and Rest-Assured Example [UPDATED]
WireMock JUnit 5 and Rest-Assured tutorial consists of a small demo about Wiremock and JUnit 5. We can create mocks and stubs with ......
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
What about splitting Wiremock library in two –
wiremock-core
andwiremock-junit4
and addingwiremock-jupiter
for JUnit 5 support?The
wiremock
library could then simply have a dependency on core and junit4 for the sake of legacy users?I’m coming around to the idea of making both JUnit 4 and 5 optional/provided dependencies. I’m going to look at this (with the usual caveats about being busy and it not happening quickly).