Store refactor
See original GitHub issueDuring the Zarr meeting today, we discussed splitting out the various Store
s in storage.py
into separate files (ideally in a Python storage
package taking the place of storage.py
). This should make it easier to identify relevant people to get feedback from when making changes to a specific Store
. Would be good to hear others thoughts on this idea 🙂
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:11 (11 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
RE Factor Tactical | Unconventional Solutions™
Veteran Owned manufacturer of tactical equipment and gear designed for Military, Law Enforcement, and Special Operations. GSA Listed.
Read more >Store Refactor · Issue #2986 · cosmos/cosmos-sdk - GitHub
The store/ is quite large and the parts are deeply interconnected with each other, so refactoring will be split into three parts: 1....
Read more >Refactor on Steam
Refactor is a hard-core tower defense game that combines modular building, route planning, and element composition.
Read more >Refactoring a JavaScript video store - Martin Fowler
Any refactoring is about improving the code in a particular direction, one that suits a development team's coding style. In the book the...
Read more >Refactor store() method when handling more than one entities ...
Refactor store () method when handling more than one entities while saving data. I need to save data from Request . It contains...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Happy either way. If listing individually, @shikharsg, @tjcrone, @TomAugspurger, and myself are the likely candidates.
I think this is an excellent idea and I support it 💯 . The storage module is way too big / complicated. I would imagine something like this