Keyword arguments for atomic indices are not consistent
See original GitHub issueDescribe the issue
We need to create consistency throughout sisl (atom
, idx
and others are currently used)
We should unify
I dislike atom
since it may indicate Atom
for users, I dislike idx/index
since it does not clarify index.
Possibly candidates:
aidx
atom_index
a_index
aindex
idx_atom
i_atom
iatom
The same applies to orbitals.
Generally I use ia
for single atomic indices (and io
for orbitals).
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:32 (32 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Working with items and attributes - Amazon DynamoDB
In Amazon DynamoDB, an item is a collection of attributes. Each attribute has a name and a value. An attribute value can be...
Read more >6. Functions - Q for Mortals - Documentation for KX products
The first case can be thought of as a unary atomic function if you fix the non-atomic argument – i.e. project the function....
Read more >Apply a function to each element of a vector — map • purrr
The map functions transform their input by applying a function to each element of a list or atomic vector and returning an object...
Read more >variable command - LAMMPS documentation
It returns a 1 for atoms that are in the group, and a 0 for atoms that are not. The rmask(x) function takes...
Read more >6. Expressions — Python 3.11.1 documentation
If any keyword argument does not correspond to a formal parameter name, a TypeError exception is raised, unless a formal parameter using the...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Ok, so we will go for
atoms
? hehehe!So
atoms
andorbitals
, any objections?What about
atom_sites
?