Reorder honeycomb lattice vectors?
See original GitHub issueI used sisl.geom.graphene
to write a simple POSCAR file of graphene. However, VASP complains about this POSCAR (and quits!) because the lattice vectors do not form a right-handed system:
ERROR: the triple product of the basis vectors
is negative exchange two basis vectors
Therefore, what do you think about permanently interchanging the first two lattice vectors of honeycomb
in sisl? Perhaps other codes will also make this complaint?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created a year ago
- Comments:7 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
(a) The honeycomb lattice with the primitive lattice vectors ...
(a) The honeycomb lattice with the primitive lattice vectors τ1 = (3/2, √ 3/2) and τ2 = (3/2, − √ 3/2). Each unit...
Read more >Inducing topological order in a honeycomb lattice
Abstract: We explore the possibility of inducing a topological insulator phase in a honeycomb lattice lacking spin-orbit interaction using a metallic (or ...
Read more >Solid state physics | Lecture 2: the Honeycomb - YouTube
This new points are given as a basis set on n vectors. Then it was shown how the Honeycomb lattice is describe by...
Read more >Tutorial 1 - Graphene
Graphene is a material made of a single atomic layer. This two dimensional system is made of Carbon atoms, arranged in a honeycomb...
Read more >Honeycomb — TeNPy 0.5.0.dev67+ebf8548 documentation
Honeycomb.ordering (order). Provide possible orderings of the N lattice sites. Honeycomb.plot_basis (ax, **kwargs). Plot arrows indicating the basis vectors ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
I think it is there now, sorry for not testing this more on my end… I am still very briefly on the computer… 😦
Looks good to me.