Question on new 3.7 feature
See original GitHub issueSorry to file an issue here but I can’t find a better point of contact.
https://docs.python.org/3.7/whatsnew/3.7.html#pep-562-customization-of-access-to-module-attributes
Does this solve the long-standing issue mentioned in the initial presentation about q, regarding __call__
on modules?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:15 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Python 3.7: Cool New Features for You to Try
Python 3.7: Cool New Features for You to Try · The breakpoint() Built-In · Data Classes · Customization of Module Attributes · Typing...
Read more >What's New In Python 3.7 — Python 3.11.1 documentation
This article explains the new features in Python 3.7, compared to 3.6. Python 3.7 was released on June 27, 2018. For full details,...
Read more >What's new in Python 3.7? - Educative.io
The latest version of Python has diverse new features and tweaks, all of which can be found in Python 3.7's official documentation.
Read more >Amazing Features Added to Python From 3.7 to Now
A rundown of the best new features added to Python since the 3.8 release in 2018 with code examples. Learn about the newest...
Read more >6 of Python's Newest and Best Features (3.7-3.9) - YouTube
A rundown of the six most recent, and coolest features added to Python in the past few years!2018 brought us a plethora of...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
I’ve added it!
@zestyping Going to second @skorokithakis’ suggestion of adding the project to the Code Shelter 😃 I really like its approach and I think q is an exceptionally useful Python package. Would you consider it?