[Device Support Request] Moes dimmer switches _TZE200_ip2akl4w & _TZE200_fjjbhx9d

This is a Tuya device that has no entities and/or controls in home assistant and its a simple Zigbee Tuya dimmer. It should be very similar to many other devices like this.

1 Gang _TZE200_ip2akl4w

{
  "node_descriptor": "NodeDescriptor(logical_type=<LogicalType.Router: 1>, complex_descriptor_available=0, user_descriptor_available=0, reserved=0, aps_flags=0, frequency_band=<FrequencyBand.Freq2400MHz: 8>, mac_capability_flags=<MACCapabilityFlags.AllocateAddress|RxOnWhenIdle|MainsPowered|FullFunctionDevice: 142>, manufacturer_code=4417, maximum_buffer_size=66, maximum_incoming_transfer_size=66, server_mask=10752, maximum_outgoing_transfer_size=66, descriptor_capability_field=<DescriptorCapability.NONE: 0>, *allocate_address=True, *is_alternate_pan_coordinator=False, *is_coordinator=False, *is_end_device=False, *is_full_function_device=True, *is_mains_powered=True, *is_receiver_on_when_idle=True, *is_router=True, *is_security_capable=False)",
  "endpoints": {
    "1": {
      "profile_id": 260,
      "device_type": "0x0051",
      "in_clusters": [
        "0x0000",
        "0x0004",
        "0x0005",
        "0xef00"
      ],
      "out_clusters": [
        "0x000a",
        "0x0019"
      ]
    },
    "242": {
      "profile_id": 41440,
      "device_type": "0x0061",
      "in_clusters": [],
      "out_clusters": [
        "0x0021"
      ]
    }
  },
  "manufacturer": "_TZE200_ip2akl4w",
  "model": "TS0601",
  "class": "zigpy.device.Device"
}

2 Gang _TZE200_fjjbhx9d

{
  "node_descriptor": "NodeDescriptor(logical_type=<LogicalType.Router: 1>, complex_descriptor_available=0, user_descriptor_available=0, reserved=0, aps_flags=0, frequency_band=<FrequencyBand.Freq2400MHz: 8>, mac_capability_flags=<MACCapabilityFlags.AllocateAddress|RxOnWhenIdle|MainsPowered|FullFunctionDevice: 142>, manufacturer_code=4417, maximum_buffer_size=66, maximum_incoming_transfer_size=66, server_mask=10752, maximum_outgoing_transfer_size=66, descriptor_capability_field=<DescriptorCapability.NONE: 0>, *allocate_address=True, *is_alternate_pan_coordinator=False, *is_coordinator=False, *is_end_device=False, *is_full_function_device=True, *is_mains_powered=True, *is_receiver_on_when_idle=True, *is_router=True, *is_security_capable=False)",
  "endpoints": {
    "1": {
      "profile_id": 260,
      "device_type": "0x0051",
      "in_clusters": [
        "0x0000",
        "0x0004",
        "0x0005",
        "0xef00"
      ],
      "out_clusters": [
        "0x000a",
        "0x0019"
      ]
    },
    "242": {
      "profile_id": 41440,
      "device_type": "0x0061",
      "in_clusters": [],
      "out_clusters": [
        "0x0021"
      ]
    }
  },
  "manufacturer": "_TZE200_fjjbhx9d",
  "model": "TS0601",
  "class": "zigpy.device.Device"
}

Thanks in advance for the support.

[Tropaion]

@javicalle Good news!!! On/Off and dimming is working. Just the communication is a bit slow/laggy, but it’s probably my shitty network -.-. Do you need some information/logs?

[javicalle]

I thought so, but the question is if both are needed.

Definitely yes. The ‘original’ one was added months ago (PR #1010) and probably was needed. I have read other reports in which the device is repeated, perhaps because the manufacturer is careless or because they reuse the definitions of other devices. We also have no way of knowing if all the definitions are being used and the risk of removing it is that something will be broken, so 🤷🏻‍♂️

BTW did you remove/change the commends I made? Do you prefer to write the whole device signature?

No. I like and prefer your way to comment. Full signature sometimes don’t match between diferent devices, but the ‘translation’ from cluster name to value is very usefull to me. Also the DEVICE SUMMARY will give a fast view to the available definitions. Once again a good idea.

I hope to release the final version today.