2.0.0-RC6: AssertionM gone
See original GitHub issueAssertionM
is gone and neither in the migration guide nor in the 2.0.0-RC6 release notes there’s a mention on how to migrate. Please update the docs and/or release notes - thx!
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created a year ago
- Comments:7 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
JenkinsPipelineSpecification (Groovy Documentation)
... { _arguments -> def args = _arguments[0] assert "label" == args[0] } } ... However, a class that "chomps" all missing events,...
Read more >ZIO.service[Traitable[Option] @@ Marker] s1 - Scastie
Assertion._ import zio.test. ... yield assert(true)(equalTo(true)) ... statically known to be contained within the environment are missing at zio.
Read more >social 11.4.0-beta2 | Drupal.org
#3298612: Update drupal/ginvite requirement from 1.1 to 2.0.1 · #3296186: Update ... #3260291: Assertion error on group membership page.
Read more >Raw - Fedora Package Sources
... LLVM License: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception URL: https://flang.llvm.org Source0: ... %check # Assertion failure: lib/Semantics/canonicalize-acc.cpp:93 ...
Read more >spotbugs Documentation
This document describes version 3.1.0-RC6 of SpotBugs. ... Extending the Eclipse Plugin (since 2.0.0) ... check program assertions.
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
@boniface That is very fair feedback. Appreciate it. We try to do that but given how close we are to a final release there doesn’t seem to be much value in deprecating things we will need to immediately delete.
At least my experience in upgrading libraries for the latest release candidate was that it was quite straightforward as almost all the changes were relatively mechanical and
IO.someMethod
can always be replaced withZIO.someMethod
and so on, but understand there is some work involved and that isn’t completely automated if you moved to a previous ZIO release candidate.Thank you for bearing with us as we get to the final version here. I think at least the experience of everyone I have worked with is ZIO 2 is dramatically nicer to use than ZIO 1, so hopefully you and your team find it was worth the wait.
Well, scalafix would fix that for you automatically. 😃