Does not support GraphQL comments
See original GitHub issueI have a schema.graphql. The tool does not like the comment and gave the following error
✗ Syntax Error GraphQL (6:1) Unexpected String
5:
6: """The available actions for this resource."""
^
7: type actions {
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:33
- Comments:11
Top Results From Across the Web
How to write comments in a GraphQL Schema to enhance ...
How to write comments in a GraphQL Schema to enhance auto-generated documentation. One of the main benefits of GraphQL is its self-documenting ...
Read more >Documentation and Comments - GraphQL - Dgraph
Dgraph accepts GraphQL documentation comments, which get passed through to the generated API and shown as documentation in GraphQL tools.
Read more >GraphQL schema basics - Apollo GraphQL Docs
Your GraphQL server uses a schema to describe the shape of your available data. This schema defines a hierarchy of types with fields...
Read more >API (GraphQL) - Add relationships between types - Amplify Docs
Currently, this supports one-to-one, one-to-many, and many-to-one relationships. ... If keyName is not provided, then @connection queries the target table's ...
Read more >Comments - GraphQL | Verbb
Comments supports accessing Comment objects via GraphQL. ... based on whether the elements are “leaves” in their structure (element with no descendants).
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
This should at least be renamed into “Does not support GraphQL descriptions” since the triple quotes indicate a description (see https://graphql.github.io/graphql-spec/draft/#sec-Descriptions).
Hi,
I disagree with the choice of words “deal breaker” makes it sound like the open source author was getting a deal from sharing their creation with you… it happens a lot with open source projects, they do get abandoned from time to time, what’s great is that this is open source so you can fork and maintain yourself.
In my case all I wanted was support to “triple quotes”, and bumping dependencies was enough to me, you can check the 2 commits I did on my fork:
The original author has moved to other projects and that’s totally fine. ❤️
Good luck to you all!