tsc-strict does not work with emitDeclarationOnly and build option.

Hi,

Because tsc-strict ends up to run tsc --strict --noEmit ...process.argv.slice(2):

• it’s not compatible with --build option:

tsc-strict -b apps/fr-app/tsconfig.json
🎯 Found 10794 strict files
⠸ Compiling with strict mode...💥 Typescript did not compile due to some errors. Errors:  [
  "error TS6369: Option '--build' must be the first command line argument."

• it’s not compatible with emitDeclarationOnly option:

λ › tsc-strict
🎯 Found 10794 strict files
⠴ Compiling with strict mode...💥 Typescript did not compile due to some errors. Errors:  [
  "error TS5053: Option 'emitDeclarationOnly' cannot be specified with option 'noEmit'."
]

Maybe passing the process.argv before strict could be enough for the build option, but I don’t know if the noEmit option is really required.

Also, for the record, I’ve a project with 13106 ts files, and tsc-strict is very longer than tsc (mainly because of the Looking for strict files step). Maybe a cache could be considered?

I’m ready to do the PR when we agree on what to do.

Thanks for your package!

[mathieutu]

Actually I think that we can leave the noEmit like this, and let devs add --emitDeclarationOnly false if they need. Also, I found out that the build option is not compatible with any config via console option (including strict), so no need to move anything.

Thanks for the cache thing!

13000 ts files

yep, and it’s only the front 😅

[KostkaBrukowa]

And about the noEmit flag I’m wondering what to do. Initially I’ve added the noEmit flag, because some project use babel to compile their projects and they don’t have noEmit flag in their tsconfig. Without this flag running tsconfig would generate bunch of js files unnecessarily (default is false). So we have three options:

1. Remove noEmit resulting in scenario above
2. Leave like it is now resulting in error with compilation with tsconfig provided by you
3. Search tsconfig and find if emitDeclarationOnly is present and don’t add noEmit when it is

I think option 3 would be the best in this case, but I’m worring that there would be more cases like that with different flags. What do you think?