When linking to exisinting files using glob option, only the portion matching the glob is used for names
See original GitHub issueConsider that I have the below files
I wish to symlink these to ~/.local/bin
directory.
When I use:
~/.local/bin:
path: scripts/display_*
glob: true
The created symlinks are named single.sh
and multiple.sh
instead of display_single.sh
and display_multiple.sh
. Is this the intended behaviour? If so, is there a way to use use globs and still get the symlinks with the complete filename?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Python Glob: Filename Pattern Matching - PYnative
Python glob module to find files and folders whose names follow a specific pattern. Search files recursively with wildcard characters.
Read more >glob – Filename pattern matching - GeeksforGeeks
Glob module searches all path names looking for files matching a specified pattern according to the rules dictated by the Unix shell.
Read more >glob – Filename pattern matching - Python Module of the Week
It is useful in any situation where your program needs to look for a list of files on the filesystem with names matching...
Read more >Shell GLOB patterns (wildcard pathname matching)
GLOB patterns do not only match file names. The names being matched by a GLOB pattern can be anything: files, directories, symbolic links,...
Read more >Glob (programming) - Wikipedia
In computer programming, glob patterns specify sets of filenames with wildcard characters. ... In addition to matching filenames, globs are also used widely...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Thank you @eengstrom !
@eengstrom I can confirm that this issue does not happen with the latest version. Thank you for your help and I apologize for wasting your time.