Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

Add tests to arviz.labels module

See original GitHub issue

#1201 has done a significant refactor of plotting functions to rewrite the labeling process. Part of the code added is tested in the sense that plots use it and tests for plots have passed, but there should be a test_labels.py in the base tests folders to test all bundled classes and test specifically the labellers.

Issue Analytics

State:
Created 3 years ago
Comments:8 (8 by maintainers)

Top GitHub Comments

1reaction

Rishabh261998commented, Apr 30, 2021

@OriolAbril, if this issue is an immediate concern, then you could start working on this, as I might not be free for the next two weeks or so as my exams are approaching and also there are some other formalities at home which I need to attend. Sorry for not informing you earlier. Thanks

1reaction

OriolAbrilcommented, Apr 1, 2021

Sounds good, let me know if you need any help

Top Results From Across the Web

No module named 'arviz.labels' - Questions - PyMC Discourse

I'm trying to relabel my variables using arviz MapLabeller from labels, very much like this Label guide. Using arviz 0.11.2 The example ...

v0.13 Milestone · GitHub

Add tests to arviz.labels module Help Wanted Testing ... add test for from_cmdstanpy to distinguish between vectors of length 1 and scalars Testing....

arviz.labels — ArviZ dev documentation

The Labeller class aims to split plot labeling in ArviZ into atomic tasks to maximize extensibility, and the few classes provided are designed...

Developer Guide — ArviZ 0.11.3 documentation

The main 3 modules are data , plots and stats , and then the tests folder is ... If adding another backend please...

arviz-devs/community - Gitter

I think that your suggestion of adding the code to Arviz makes the most sense. I am wondering what unit tests would make...