Plot posterior gives anomalous results for small values
See original GitHub issueDescribe the bug I have a model with a small parameter, and on plot posterior the variable is displayed (incorrectly) as having a mean of “0.0” and an HPD between 0.0 and 0.0.
Here’s a snippet of the picture:
To Reproduce
Attached a Jupyter notebook sufficient to reproduce the issue (had to attach it as a .txt
file, but should simply be rename-able to run).
Expected behavior Expected the values displayed to be scaled appropriately.
Additional context
arviz
version 0.3.3
MacOS Mojave
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:9 (9 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Detecting Anomalies in Data
sampler. Post processing of BARD results. Description. Draw samples from the posterior distribution to give the locations of anomalous segments.
Read more >Anomalous values and missing data in clinical and ... - NCBI
Anomalous values can be the result of errors of recording, typing, measurement by instruments, or may be true outliers.
Read more >Single Model-Based Anomaly Detection for Multi-Item Datasets
Detecting anomalies on time series has a comprehensive usage field ... of the preceding and posterior values of the corresponding operators
Read more >A Multi-Level Anomaly Detection Algorithm for Time-Varying ...
Abstract This work presents a modeling and analysis framework for graph se- quences which addresses the challenge of detecting and contextualizing anoma-.
Read more >BAYESIAN ANOMALY DETECTION METHODS FOR ... - JSTOR
Anomaly detection on graphs of social or communication ... The definition of a graph anomaly ... with the same parameters gives very similar...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Should we use significant digits instead of rounding?
What about allowing a custom format string? We could change the
hpd[0].round(round_to)
toformat_str.format(hpd[0])
ifformat_string
is present, otherwise, the round_to argument would be used. It could also allow the option of using a list instead of a string to use different format for every plot.