Material binding lost when referenced
See original GitHub issueDescribe the bug objects loses there material binding when the primitive is referenced
def Xform "Root"
{
def "reference1" (
prepend references = @../my_beautiful_tree.usda@</g_geometry>
)
{
}
}
To Reproduce Setup a usd file that points to another usd that has material binding setup and render it
Used Software Versions
- Arnold 6.0.1.0
- USD: 0.19.11
- Compiler: Visual studio 2017
- OS: windows 10
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:9 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
primitive losing material binding when becoming a prototype
The short answer is that USD data inside a “reference” composition arc cannot see outside the root of that reference. So suppose you...
Read more >Getting Out of Binding Situations in JavaScript - A List Apart
In JavaScript, binding is always explicit, and can easily be lost, ... The method loses its implicit binding, and this stops referencing its...
Read more >Missing required view with ID with view binding and ...
The problem that you are facing is that TabItem is just a dummy view. Looking in the source code you can see that...
Read more >UsdShade Material Assignment - Pixar Graphics
With the ability to add bindings on the referencing (enclosing) model that targets and overrides bindings on its referenced sub-models, we can provide...
Read more >Binding energy - Wikipedia
In physics and chemistry, binding energy is the smallest amount of energy required to remove a particle from a system of particles or...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@kreppene I think I know what’s going wrong with your workflow. Let me do some tests and get back to you with a solution.
This is going to be resolved by using #292 . Closing this ticket down.