Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Processor claiming arguments not matching when they do in code
See original GitHub issueGetting this error the first time I compile each time:
e: error: Factory method parameters do not match constructor @Assisted parameters.
Missing:
* androidx.lifecycle.SavedStateHandle handle
Unknown:
* androidx.lifecycle.SavedStateHandle arg0
The argument name does actually match, and this error goes away upon building a second time. Not sure interaction is causing this.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:2
- Comments:5 (1 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Processor claiming arguments not matching when they do in ...
Getting this error the first time I compile each time: e: error: Factory method parameters do not match constructor @Assisted parameters.
Read more >Expression Lambda error "Argument types do not match"
I resolved this! The problem was the IfThenElse expression neither does an implicit return like a Block does, nor does it allow an...
Read more >Argument processing in Unix and Windows - Julio Merino
The program name in argv[0] , which we set as fake-name , does not match the name of the binary that ran the...
Read more >Database Engine events and errors - SQL Server
Consult this MSSQL error code list to find explanations for error messages for SQL Server database engine events.
Read more >Guidance on Coding and Billing Date of Service on ... - CMS
Providers need to determine the Medicare rules and regulations concerning the date of service and submit claims appropriately. Be sure your ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
I am also getting the same issue in a multi-module project,
Factory method parameters do not match constructor @Assisted parameters. Both parameter type and name must match. public UserAdminViewModal(@org.jetbrains.annotations.NotNull() ^ Declared by constructor, unmatched in factory method:
For future solution seekers -> https://github.com/square/AssistedInject/issues/81#issuecomment-606101211