--layout CLI param help confusing
See original GitHub issuethe help text for --layout
is confusing - it should clearly state that not specifying a layout will make all embeddings in the dataset available, and that specifying layout names will restrict options to those specified.
Changes to be made:
- CLI parameter --layout modified to accept N embedding names (rather than the current restriction of one). Any specified will present in the web UI. Default, if not specified, is to present all embeddings.
- CLI parameter --layout changes to --embedding. Help and error text in the CLI change corresponding.
- UI text changes from layout to embedding (eg, in the menu used to select an embedding)
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:17 (11 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Is there a "standard" format for command line/shell help text?
@DanielPryden I think the answer in that question is a little misleading. It gives links that explain what switches should be accepted and...
Read more >What are good habits for designing command line arguments?
Linux has tools for parsing such parameters and flags in an easy way ... Try to design your software from the command line...
Read more >Command-line syntax overview for System.CommandLine
Most command-line apps support subcommands, also known as verbs. ... An option is a named parameter that can be passed to a command....
Read more >Confusing / unclear -nameFromTemplate parameter #3 - GitHub
I am asked for the nameFromTemplate parameter in both cases. Azure CLI just works. @alex-frankel I send the template and params file via...
Read more >Command Line Interface Guidelines
An open-source guide to help you write better command-line programs, taking traditional UNIX principles and updating them for the modern day.
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Is the difference in load time more than a few seconds? I think it’s worth a few seconds to have all the layouts available.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 2:34 PM Bruce Martin notifications@github.com wrote:
I actually think this is outdated; now that we support any layout specified in
adata.obsm['X_foo']
, we could probably even just remove this argument. If we keep it, I’d be in favor of the changed functionality you propose where it specifies a default instead.On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:38 AM Lia Prins notifications@github.com wrote: