Question: Running under aiorun or asyncio?
See original GitHub issueIs there a way to figure out inside a task, if the loop runs under aiorun
or pure asyncio
?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
cjrh/aiorun: A "run" function for asyncio-based apps ... - GitHub
creates a Task for the given coroutine (schedules it on the event loop),; calls loop.run_forever() ,; adds default (and smart) signal handlers for...
Read more >How to use the aiorun.run function in aiorun - Snyk
To help you get started, we've selected a few aiorun.run examples, based on ... for i in range(10)) await asyncio.sleep(0.01) raise Exception("Stops the ......
Read more >asyncio run or run_until_complete - python - Stack Overflow
run_until_complete () is that you're executing your code under the semantics close to those of the new asyncio.run , even on older Python ......
Read more >Async IO in Python: A Complete Walkthrough
This tutorial is built to help you answer that question, giving you a firmer grasp of Python's approach to async IO. Here's what...
Read more >module browser.aio - Brython documentation
This module supports asynchronous programming in Brython, using the keywords async and await . It replaces the asyncio module in CPython standard library,...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I had the same idea to try to import
aiorun
and if that fails, assuming that I run under pureasyncio
. But there is the edge case, that you have it installed, but still run the program underasyncio
, e.g. by not importing it in the first place, simulating that it is missing. (I know, I know, that’s a messy way to check a program …)Since I don’t like global variables and the function initiating the closing program is only two classes deep, I pass an argument through to it. But I like your Singleton approach! I’ll ponder to change to this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singleton_pattern#Python_implementation