Failing tests in headless mode
See original GitHub issueIn headless mode, some tests start to fail. The interesting part is that these tests start to pass if I revert the change made to SearchableComboBoxTest
in PR #1253 i.e. revert NUMPAD -> DIGIT. Not sure if this is a short coming of the monocle framework, TestFX or our tests 😃
This issue is a blocker for PR #1257
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Test failing only in headless chrome - Stack Overflow
I have some integration tests using wdio, they are all passing. However, when I run them in headless chrome, one of these tests...
Read more >Headless testing on Chrome browser fails few times for no ...
There are many things that could cause tests to fail in headless and pass in head mode. The most likely cause is timing....
Read more >Headless Chrome causing tests to fail? · Issue #3130 - GitHub
I have written a number of tests that successfully pass when running through the Chrome Driver normally, however if running with Headless ......
Read more >Tests in headless mode stopped working in Test Studio - Telerik
Hello Telerik Team, Some time ago my test lists started failing with no steps being executed at all (0 test steps performed in...
Read more >Headless Browser Testing Clarified | by Zhimin Zhan - Medium
Test Failures only in Headless execution are a pain to debug. A couple of weeks ago, one engineer showed me two test executions...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
On a second thought, I can take care of reverting the change as a part of PR #1257
Sounds good to me. Thanks for taking the time to look into the issue.