[Sitemaps] Parser assumes file encoding is the same as the one used by default on JVM
See original GitHub issueSiteMapParser creates Readers from the byte[] content by assuming that the file
encoding is the same as the one use by default on the JVM.
We should use Tika's charset detector (or ICU4J directly) to detect the charset
used prior to creating the Readers.
Will attach a test class shortly.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by digitalpebble
on 19 Jan 2015 at 4:51
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 8 years ago
- Comments:13 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
What is the default encoding of the JVM? - java - Stack Overflow
UTF-16 is how text is represented internally in the JVM. The default encoding determines how the JVM interprets bytes read from files (using...
Read more >How to set Encoding in Java | Edureka Community
When you are encoding or decoding, you can query the file.encoding property or Charset.defaultCharset() to find the current default encoding, ...
Read more >Resolved Problems - Oracle Help Center
1 specification, which states that if a request/response contains both a Content-Length header as well as a Transfer-Encoding: Chunked header, the Content- ...
Read more >STR04-J. Use compatible character encodings when ...
Compatible encodings must be used when characters are output as an array of bytes then input by another JVM and subsequently converted back...
Read more >NBT format - Minecraft Wiki - Fandom
The Named Binary Tag (NBT) is a tree data structure used by Minecraft in many save files to store arbitrary data. The format...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@kkrugler this has been covered elsewhere indeed.
@jnioche - since you originally opened this issue, can you confirm what Sebastian is seeing and then close it if this has been subsumed by #67 and #137? Thanks!