[SEMANTIC-90] [Bug] Metric definition issue with custom schema macro

Is this a new bug in dbt_metrics?

• I believe this is a new bug in dbt_metrics
• I have searched the existing issues, and I could not find an existing issue for this bug

Current Behavior

When attempting to run a metric (in Mode), I get the following error message:

net.snowflake.client.jdbc.SnowflakeSQLException: SQL compilation error:
Schema 'DATABASE.TARGET_SCHEMA_CUSTOM_SCHEMA' does not exist or not authorized.

Which makes sense because the models are actually materialized in CUSTOM_SCHEMA

Expected Behavior

The metric reference should take into account the fact that the model schema rules have been customized using a custom get_custom_schema.sql macro.

Steps To Reproduce

Use the following custom schema macro:

{% macro generate_schema_name(custom_schema_name, node) -%}
    {%- set default_schema = target.schema -%}
    {%- if target.name == 'prod'  -%}
        {%- if custom_schema_name is not none -%}
            {{ custom_schema_name }}
        {%- else -%}
            {{ default_schema }}
        {%- endif -%}
    {%- else -%}
        {%- if custom_schema_name is not none -%}
            {{ default_schema }}_{{ custom_schema_name }} 
        {%- else -%}
            {{ default_schema }}
        {%- endif -%}
    {%- endif -%}
{%- endmacro %}

Then define a metric and attempt to visualize it in Mode Analytics.

Relevant log output

No response

Environment

- dbt-adapter & version: dbt-snowflake v1.3.0
- dbt_metrics version: 1.3.0

Which database adapter are you using with dbt?

snowflake

Additional Context

Community slack: https://getdbt.slack.com/archives/C046L0VTVR6/p1668870928882369?thread_ts=1668868370.759179&cid=C046L0VTVR6

[callum-mcdata]

Hey @raphaelvarieras it appears that this is a bug with the Semantic Layer - unfortunately we’re in a code freeze for this week due to the holidays but our engineers will begin scoping it out this week. As soon as I have more tactical information I’ll be sure to let you know!

[raphaelvarieras]

Sure thing - is this what you wanted to see?